M

You know who you are

Whether you voted for McCain or Obamah, whether you bleed red or blue...
we can all celebrate a historic accomplishment for the United States tonight.

Tonight we can celebrate with every person of color who has ever felt left out of this great American political and social experiment. We should all enjoy deep belly laughs of joy to know that the dreams with which Martin Luther King died did not perish with him. Tonight a nation awakened from this dream to discover that the world King envisioned is closer -- much, much closer -- to reality.

Whether or not we believe this was the right man with the right ideas, it is certainly a right thing in at least this one sense.

Celebrate.

Remember, there are places still on our planet where Martin Luther King's dream cannot even be had yet. We can continue to lead the world towards a day when an "untouchable," a person from a despised cast in society, can become leader of the world. President Obamah's victory tonight does not stall our quest for a world made more human in this way. In at least this one sense, it accelerates it.

I cried when I saw Jesse Jackson crying tonight. I felt more human. I hope for one moment, you can transcend your political philosophy and enjoy this moment.

Until the Nations know the freedom and equality that come in Christ...

Alex

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I love it when you write,
"Canuck out."

It makes me chuckle and I don't even know what it means.

Reply to This

Uncanny. A couple hours after writing this post and I read:
"U.S. Airstrike Reported to Hit Afghan Wedding" with 40 civilians killed (including women and children) and 28 others wounded.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/06/world/asia/06afghan.html?_r=2&...

Enough said?

Reply to This

Nice blog guys!

Good discussion between Sam and John.

I think sometimes we need to see all the other issues at stake as well. Like war? How many kids have Bush killed in other countries totally innocent.

I agree abortion is totally against humanity, but voting red we sometimes put a "pro-war, pro killing the innocent" in office as well!

I guess that sometimes I just don't get American politics!

Reply to This

Hermann, Interesting observation. Just as pro-choice is not always pro-abortion, pro-war is not always pro-killing the innocent.

But you're very right...It seems that for some killing an evil (terrorism, abortion) permits the inhumanity of killing the innocence in the process.

Either way you go, it may be a matter of choosing one's poison.

Thanks for the contribution.

Reply to This

I for one am very proud today, knowing a thoughtful, sensible, intelligent man will be taking office to represent me as an American.

A man that has put a kinder, gentler face on this nation. A man that has inspired unity and participation by so many.

I worked on the Obama campaign in my city. It was incredible. The positive energy flowing from our collective efforts is not to be discounted. Very spiritual stuff.

And as each one of us put our best foot forward as representatives for Obama, I was reminded of how I try to do this for Christ each day. Understandably, my mission for Obama demanded far less, lol.

But I'm pleased to have participated and even more so that WE were successful.

It IS a historic and proud moment for both President Elect Obama & the American public.

Now....I've read some of the comments here on this site and I supposed I am not surprised to find the abortion issue being raised.

While I respect others rights to their opinion, I do take issue with this term 'abortionist' being bandied about and assigned to Obama. It simply is not true.

Furthermore, legislating morality is for me, a sensitive topic. As a woman I most certainly resent any law being passed that limits my choices. As I understand it, life begins when the 'breath' of life is instilled in us...that is to say, at birth.

Mosaic law never addressed abortion. There is a law dealing with the fine a man would incur if he caused a woman to lose her 'fruit' but it is only if he costs the WOMAN her life, that an 'eye for an eye' comes into play. Certainly if God viewed this same fruit as a life he'd have called it that and it would merit the same punishment as one received for killing someone.

But I do believe as the fetus develops and nears the time of birth you would seem to have a 'live' person, and even children born up to 4 months early can survive.

So I guess from where I sit, a child that has reached the stage where they can survive outside the womb is not something anymore...it's someone.

But the morning after pill and 1st trimester abortions are a non issue for me.

And truth be told, I am more in favor of focusing on those lost souls already here...it seems to me they are crying out for mercy and we don't know they will be taken up by God necessarily, as we do believe to be the case with infants (and those who see this extended to the unborn).

I realized I have just debuted here and I've picked a political hot potato to start with but I am feeling pretty zen with what I've just said, so go ahead. Pile on and tell me where I've gone astray....

Reply to This

Karla, Nice entry into the sphere of M.
Sounds like you had lots of fun working for the campaign. I can imagine it must have been a rush to work so hard and win.
Congrats.

I trust you'll get some input on your comment.

Reply to This

Karla, congratulations on contributing to such an incredible culmination that once again epitomises the inherent potential of humanity. You must feel so proud!

I don't pretend to be an sort of Scriptural expert on the topic of abortion, but I will say this - I believe in the inherent sanctity of human life, for no other reason than that we're taught in Genesis that each and every single one of us is the 'Imago Dei', the image of God. This has natural consequences - if I believe I'm made in the image of God, that means every single other human being is as well, and I should treat them as such.

Now I live in Australia so I'll be citing whatever information I've been able to scrounge up - but from what I've heard Obama is pro-choice, which as Alex so insightfully highlighted isn't synonymous with pro-abortion. I'm not sure exactly to what extent he's pro-choice, but I believe that I choice should be available in some circumstances, such as in pregnancies resulting from rape and where the mother's health is at risk.

I know of a girl whose mother, because she was Catholic, chose not to have an abortion, and paid in the ultimate price in the end. As a result, her father became an alcoholic and abandoned the children, and she has been ostracised and blamed by her 3 siblings for that loss. She to this day bares immense scars and guilt and blame... and has on numerous occasions attempted suicide. Only the constant reminder that her mother paid the price for her to live so she should make something of her life keeps her going.

I think when we put a human face to an ideological position religious fundamentalism becomes a harder position to hold on to. I believe God loves every child. I believe that He has a purpose and a plan for every single one. But I also believe He loves her father and those other 3 children who, as a result, have had their lives turned into living hell as a result.

Similarly, not every rape victim has the incredible social support network of a church or similar belief system to assist them as they not only recover from such horrific and undeniable trauma but really consider the nature of what they now carry within them as a result. Can we really be so flippantly judgemental and condemnatory, or should we respond as Christ did - WITH LOVE!

Harking back to the woman so unceremoniously dumped at the feet of Jesus as He was teaching at the Temple Court who had been caught in the very ACT of adultery - "Neither do I condemn you, go and sin no more." He gave her the gift of no condemnation first, before commanding that she go and sin no more. From my experience I think too often the church has gotten that the wrong way around.

Just my two cents.
Peace. Love. Justice.

Reply to This

Hi Wes,

You said something that I failed to articulate in my post:

"I think when we put a human face to an ideological position religious fundamentalism becomes a harder position to hold on to."

That is extremely important and I think we would all do well to consider that point. We cannot pretend to know what the woman considering this option is up against.

And it is difficult for me to imagine any woman being flippant with this decision, Christian or otherwise.

What frightens me I think more than anything is should this avenue become unavailable, we will see women return to the day of the coat hangers and other back alley options.

Education and access to health resources/birth control for women seems a more viable way to reduce the number of abortions nationally.

Anyhow, thanks, I really appreciate your input on this matter.

Shalom

Reply to This

Karla,

Just a couple of quick qs...



It may be difficult for you to imagine someone being flippant, but does that mean this doesn't happen? I can definitely imagine flippant young men forcing their pregnant girlfriends into decisions they wouldn't otherwise make.

Also aren't references to the days of coat hangers just a scare tactic meant to shut down conversation? [Not on your part, but on the movement that creates those talking points]. I mean, I can't even find a metal coat hanger anymore. All of ours are the thick plastic kind. With the technology available today, why would anybody go back to the mid 19th century for a technique of ending the life of an baby? Certainly, even illegal abortions would much, much safer today. That's what makes it seem to me that this imagery is just a tactic.

Interested in your thoughts on these honest qs...

Reply to This

Still get metal coat hangers at the dry cleaners. Luckily. I use them to break into my car when I lock the keys in.

Reply to This

well, there you go.

Reply to This

Perhaps someone (more educated than I) should discuss this in the context of what happens when we try to make something illegal that has been legal for years. I know there are good historic examples (alcohol comes to mind) of it not being very successful, and causing more problems than it helps.....Also, if the goal is to change hearts (rather than change laws), should we be fighting for moral ambiguity and freedom to live as Sojourners in this world? Should be we on the side of everything being permissible, and then strive to teach/live what is beneficial, thus showing people a better way? If we thought like this, what walls would be torn down?

Reply to This

RSS

Events

Thoughts from the IMN

The Human Event – Michigan

Join us at Kensington Community Church (Troy, Michigan) on October 13-14 for a 2-day conversation on the future of the church in the post-Christian and Trans-human 21st century west.

Neil Cole (Organic Church) Alex McManus (M Network)

and You.

Who is the Human Event for? Forward thinking, missional activists, thinkers, and leaders. If you think that may be [...]

Holiness and Risk

A few hours after touching down back in Scotland from The International Mentoring Network’s Immersion experience in Orlando, I found myself in a conversation about a Methodist Church initiative called Holiness and Risk.

Is it okay if I tell you a little about this? It’s a really intriguing kind of thing that can emerge [...]

Tomorrow and How to Get There – The Futuristic

Tomorrow.  Face it with either fear or anticipation, it doesn’t matter which, it is coming regardless of our grasp of it.  Fortunes have been made marketing knowledge about tomorrow whether that tomorrow is 24 hours away or 100 years distant.

Fortune tellers make the promise that that can allay our fears with their prognostication [...]

Communities of Knowing

In his book, The Message in the Bottle, Walker Percy tells the fictional story of a train that hurried through the countryside. The commuters on board saw the passing scenery as little more than a two-dimensional background rolling past their windows.

One day, though, the train breaks down and the commuters have to disembark by a [...]

Into the Beautiful Unknown (Cross-Posted)

Since Alex is publishing this blog post with the IMN newsletter, I thought it ought to have a link from the IMN as well. Enjoy. -Your friendly neighborhood editor-of-doom.

Sometimes I’m asked, What does “M” stand for? I usually answer, “Exactly.” The question is understandable. I use M a lot.

My website is theimn. My social network [...]

Badge

Loading…

© 2010   Created by Alex McManus.   Powered by .

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!